Uncategorized

Watching Bitcoin, Dogecoin, Etc: Raised from 2014-01-05, Plus Update Graph

If you would rather just see Highlighted Posts.

Watching Bitcoin, Dogecoin, Etc. Raised from 2014-01-05, Plus Update Graph

2018-12-08 16:02:15 PST Market Capitalization: 278 billion dollars.

Brad DeLong (2014): Watching Bitcoin, Dogecoin, Etc. : Underpinning the value of gold is that if all else fails you can use it to make pretty things. Underpinning the value of the dollar is a combination of (a) the fact that you can use them to pay your taxes to the U.S. government, and (b) that the Federal Reserve is a potential dollar submerge and has promised to buy them back and extinguish them if their real value starts to submerge at (much) more than 2%/year (yes, I know).

Placing a ceiling on the value of gold is mining technology, and the uitzicht that if its price gets out of whack for long on the upside a excellent overeenkomst more of it will be created. Placing a ceiling on the value of the dollar is the Federal Reserve’s role spil actual dollar source, and its commitment not to permit deflation to toebijten.

Placing a ceiling on the value of bitcoins is pc technology and the form of the hash function. until the limit of 21 million bitcoins is reached. Placing a floor on the value of bitcoins is. what, exactly?

At the ogenblik, it’s only a $Ten billion bubble–or, if you are going to persuade mij that it is not a bubble, you are going to have to find mij a market player willing to become a bitcoin submerge.

Timothy B. Lee has clever things to say:

Timothy B. Lee: Dogecoins and Litecoins and Peercoins oh my: What you need to know about Bitcoin alternatives: “Dogecoin is a joke. Tho’ weirdly it’s a joke that, at least on paper, is worth millions of dollars.

. The founders of Dogecoin took the source code of another Bitcoin variant called Litecoin, made some further tweaks, and rebranded it spil ‘Dogecoin’. That’s a reference to the canine variant of lolcats, an Internet meme where a grammatically challenged dog makes excited statements. Dogecoin has bot around for less than a month. Te that time, the value of all dogecoins te existence has skyrockted from zero to more than $8 million. Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, did an amazing job of building a payment network that is secure, scalable and useful. But he wasn’t flawless, he made some vormgeving decisions that might not look so excellent ter retrospect. The problem is that thanks to Bitcoin’s decentralized vormgeving, it’s not effortless to switch the core Bitcoin protocol. Hence, if you have an idea for an improved version of Bitcoin, it’s lighter to begin your own virtual currency.

Most of the altcoins have focused on improving mining, the process the Bitcoin network uses to process transactions. Ter the Bitcoin mining process, hundreds of computers wedren to solve a repetitive math problem. The winner of the wedstrijd gets to add a ‘block’ to the Bitcoin network’s global transaction register, and to award itself 25 bitcoins (toughly 20,000 dollars) for its trouble.

One problem is that the mathematical formula at the core of the Bitcoin mining process, called a hash function, can be performed much more efficiently by expensive, custom-built designed computers than with an ordinary PC. Spil a result, mining has become an increasingly specialized activity, with people spending thousands of dollars on chips whose only function is to mine Bitcoins.

It s no longer cost efficient to mine Bitcoins with an ordinary PC—the electro-therapy consumed is worth more than the bitcoins produced. A Bitcoin alternative called Litecoin substitutes Bitcoin s hash based mining process with an alternative that s tighter to accelerate with dedicated hardware. Spil this is being written, the value of all Litecoins is more than. 500 million dollars.

The 2nd Bitcoin flaw is the. mining process is a computational arms wedloop. The Bitcoin principle that miners with more computing power earn more Bitcoins is known spil ‘proof of work’. Several Bitcoin alternatives use an alternative principle called ‘proof of stake’, where miners with the most virtual specie earn the most. That treatment eliminates the incentive to spend ever-larger sums of money on mining hardware, which is good for the environment.

All bitcoins te circulation are worth around Ten billion dollars. Its nearest rival, Litecoin, has a total market value of around 500 million dollars. The other virtual currencies are worth much less.

Okay. Suppose that you’re on the island of Yap and it is the late 18th century.

You want to get richer. You can either work on Yap doing something useful, or catamaran overheen to Palau where the limestone is, carve a big lump of limestone into a disk, catamaran it back, and use it spil money. If the value of stone money is too low, it won’t be worth anyone’s while to catamaran overheen to Palau. Thus the stone money supply will zekering growing if the price dips. Spil long spil the relative desire to use stone money does not shrink swifter than per-capita income on Yap plus the population of Yap grows, the value of stone money on Yap will be determined by its cost of production–that is, the cost of catamaraning it overheen to Palau, carving the limestone disk, and bringing it back.

Wij can see this at work come the late 19th century. Europeans vertoning up with stengel implements that make it a loterijlot lighter to carve limestone disks on Palau. Thus there is a ample boom te the limestone disk-carving stone money-mining industry. And the value of stone money on Yap Falls spil the money supply grows.

Now suppose that you were on the Internet and it is the early 21st century.

You want to get richer. You can either work doing something useful, or you can set up a botnet to mine BitCoins, or you can fork the code behind BitCoin and set up your own slightly-tweaked virtual cryptographic money network. Setting up a fresh, alternative network is truly cheap. Thus unless BitCoin going can somehow successfully differentiate itself from the latecomers who are about to emerge, the money supply of BitCoin-like things is infinite because the cost of production of them is infinitesimal.

How can BitCoin successfully keep itself differentiated from the latecomer copiers?

By asserting, overheen and overheen again, simply that it wasgoed very first. And this might work. But I am skeptical.

By stressing that it has a trustworthy track record of being a safe store of value–and thus appealing to a history that the latecomers do not have. This works until someday, for some reason, request for BitCoins falls. Then supply and request drives the value down. BitCoin is then no longer differentiated spil a safe store of value. Then the people who were holding BitCoin because they thought it wasgoed a safe store of value dump it, its price falls even more, and so it becomes even more questionable spil safe store of value. And the downward spiral proceeds.

Note that ter thesis respects–unless it can successfully and permanently differentiate itself from other virtual cryptographic money networks–BitCoin is like fiat money, and unlike 18th and 19th century Yap stone money, ter that its cost of production is zero.

So how do actual fiat moneys maintain their value? Well, they don’t always do so–cough Zimbabwe, cough Weimar Germany. When they do so, it is because a government (a) accepts its money te payment of taxes, thus providing people a reason to hold it, (b) doesn’t want the financial puinhoop that hyperinflation would generate, and so (c) sets its central handelsbank the mission of being a currency sink–of maintaining the value of the currency by buying it back and searing it up if necessary. Thus I tend to be a “chartalist”: commodity moneys can maintain their value via their cost of production, but fiat moneys maintain their value when some very large too-big-to-fail entity backs them.

Te my view, BitCoin’s chances would be a loterijlot better if there were some large and durable entity that promised to be a BitCoin bury if necessary. If, say, Google Cayman Islands were to commence GoogleCoin, and announce that it would always stand ready to buy back GoogleCoins at a motionless real value, it could make a (puny) fortune and, I think, eliminate BitCoin’s business te a month.

Related movie: 2018 Will Be A Big Year For Litecoin $Two,000 Price Prediction For LTC


Leave a Reply